Good news for claimants!

Rebecca Mogford Andrews v Retro Computers Ltd [2019] EWHC B2 (Costs) Good news has come for Claimants in the form of the decision made by Deputy Master Friston in the case of Andrews v Retro Computers Ltd [2019] EWHC B2 (Costs). Claimants are often on the receiving end of Points of Dispute from Defendants asking for…

Contracting out of fixed costs

Jack Andrew Miss Seyi Adelekun -v- Mrs Siu Lai Ho   The conflict between fixed costs and traditional costs on an hourly rate basis continues. In the helpful case of Miss Seyi Adelekun -v- Mrs Siu Lai Ho, his Honour Judge Wulwik has made an important decision that fixed costs did not apply to a…

Clarity in Costs Management Orders

The recent case of Vertannes v United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust deals with the Claimant’s Bill of Cost being drafted in the incorrect format following an approved Cost Management Order (CMO). A CMO was made on the 9th April 2015. Following developments within the case further Orders were made by the court in relation to…

MRN’s Top Costs Tips 2019

To bring in the new year we’ve asked some of our experts for their top costs tips, which we’ve put together for you into a handy top 10 guide! We hope that you find something new to put into practice in 2019!   Bargain for reductions early! Jessica Wiggins – Wherever possible, negotiate Counsel’s fees…

Part 36 and Payments on Account

In Finnegan v Spiers (t/a Frank Spiers Licensed Conveyancers) [2018] EWHC 3064 (Ch) Mr Justice Birss, on Appeal from the Order of District Judge Kelly, considered the question of whether or not the Court had the power to order a payment on account of costs where a Part 36 offer had been accepted under Rule…

Price to pay for not discussing cost

Ayton v RSM Bentley Jennison and Others [2018] EWCH 2851 (QB)   The Defendant was ordered to pay costs in a professional negligence claim, having rejected the chance to settle costs, where the High Court made an Interim Costs Order in the sum of £430,000.00, and costs were to be assessed on an indemnity basis.…

Are Consent Orders worth it?

Riordan and Ors v Moon Beever Solicitors (a firm) [2018] EWHC 1452 (QB)   Since the introduction of the CPR in 1999 the Courts have had unfettered control to vary any Court Order, including Consent Orders. However, it seems to be the general consensus that where there has been a genuine agreement by both/all parties…