×
We can continue to attend conferences and hearings either by phone or by video conference. All our experts and advocates are also readily available and are more than happy to assist you if you have a question you need answering at short notice, or need assistance.
When getting in touch, please call using the main numbers
✆ 0161 830 8474 or
✆ 0113 247 1549.
You can also instruct us Online or you can contact team member’s Direct .
If you experience any difficulty connecting, you can call any of the following mobile numbers:
✆ 07970368665
✆ 07932238437
and our Client Care team stand ready to assist.
All our experts and members of staff are working remotely
We remain confident that we can continue to provide the quality of service that you rightly expect during these uncertain times. We already have the infrastructure in place to ensure business continuity so there will be no difference in your ability to access our services quickly and efficiently.We can continue to attend conferences and hearings either by phone or by video conference. All our experts and advocates are also readily available and are more than happy to assist you if you have a question you need answering at short notice, or need assistance.
When getting in touch, please call using the main numbers
✆ 0161 830 8474 or
✆ 0113 247 1549.
You can also instruct us Online or you can contact team member’s Direct .
If you experience any difficulty connecting, you can call any of the following mobile numbers:
✆ 07970368665
✆ 07932238437
and our Client Care team stand ready to assist.
BUDGET RECOVERY (ON AVERAGE)
CLIENT SATISFACTION
SERVICING 200+ FIRMS
LATEST NEWS
Litigation in Person Costs & the Chorley Principle
Jack Holland In the recent case of JMH (By her Litigation Friend AB) v CFH and Another [2020] Costs LR 1681 focus was placed upon the ability of a practitioner’s ability to secure costs at solicitor’s rates as opposed to litigant in person rates when acting as an agent for their firm. The background…
No interest on costs of loans granted but has the door been left open?
Jack Holland The case of Godfrey v Automotive Products Limited was a claim for noise-induced hearing loss where the claim settled pre-issue in the sum of £2,000.00. As part of the claim for costs, a sum of £388.71 was sought within the Bill of Costs totalling £7,233.48 for the interests of a funding loan which…
Qualification on DBA Termination
Jack Holland A Court of Appeal judgment on the termination of Damages Based Agreements (DBA’s) has recently been handed down in the case of Zuberi v Lexlaw Limited seemingly bringing to an end the uncertainty surrounding termination prior to conclusion and the ability for a Solicitor to recover its’ costs. The facts of the…
