×
We can continue to attend conferences and hearings either by phone or by video conference. All our experts and advocates are also readily available and are more than happy to assist you if you have a question you need answering at short notice, or need assistance.
When getting in touch, please call using the main numbers
✆ 0161 830 8474 or
✆ 0113 247 1549.
You can also instruct us Online or you can contact team member’s Direct .
If you experience any difficulty connecting, you can call any of the following mobile numbers:
✆ 07779572702
✆ 07970368665
✆ 07932238437
and our Client Care team stand ready to assist.
All our experts and members of staff are working remotely
We remain confident that we can continue to provide the quality of service that you rightly expect during these uncertain times. We already have the infrastructure in place to ensure business continuity so there will be no difference in your ability to access our services quickly and efficiently.We can continue to attend conferences and hearings either by phone or by video conference. All our experts and advocates are also readily available and are more than happy to assist you if you have a question you need answering at short notice, or need assistance.
When getting in touch, please call using the main numbers
✆ 0161 830 8474 or
✆ 0113 247 1549.
You can also instruct us Online or you can contact team member’s Direct .
If you experience any difficulty connecting, you can call any of the following mobile numbers:
✆ 07779572702
✆ 07970368665
✆ 07932238437
and our Client Care team stand ready to assist.
BUDGET RECOVERY (ON AVERAGE)
CLIENT SATISFACTION
SERVICING 200+ FIRMS
LATEST NEWS
Indemnity Costs and the Courts Discretion
Melissa Parnham Indemnity v Standard costs – The importance of ADR and the type of offers made In Jagger v Holland [2020] EWHC 1197 (QB) a successful Defendant was not permitted to recover costs on the indemnity basis partially due to a failure to engage in ADR, despite making a time limited offer during the…
Group Litigation and Significant Development Budget; Mr Justice Turner refuses to take “leap of faith”
Lindsay Woolford In the recent High Court decision in Hutson and Others v Tata Steel UK Ltd [2020] Costs LR 369, consideration was given to the factors to apply in an Application to revise a Party’s Budget under PD 3E, where Significant Developments warrant such revisions. The Relevant Rules In respect of the revision to…
When would Relief from Sanctions be an injustice?
David Burke In the recent case of Heathfield International LLC v Axiom Stone” (London) Ltd [2020] EWHC 1075 (Ch) the 2nd Defendant filed their Costs Budget out of time. They issued an application for relief from sanction and may well have expected to obtain the same in light of the approach to be taken following “Denton”…
