×
We can continue to attend conferences and hearings either by phone or by video conference. All our experts and advocates are also readily available and are more than happy to assist you if you have a question you need answering at short notice, or need assistance.
When getting in touch, please call using the main numbers
✆ 0161 830 8474 or
✆ 0113 247 1549.
You can also instruct us Online or you can contact team member’s Direct .
If you experience any difficulty connecting, you can call any of the following mobile numbers:
✆ 07970368665
✆ 07932238437
and our Client Care team stand ready to assist.
All our experts and members of staff are working remotely
We remain confident that we can continue to provide the quality of service that you rightly expect during these uncertain times. We already have the infrastructure in place to ensure business continuity so there will be no difference in your ability to access our services quickly and efficiently.We can continue to attend conferences and hearings either by phone or by video conference. All our experts and advocates are also readily available and are more than happy to assist you if you have a question you need answering at short notice, or need assistance.
When getting in touch, please call using the main numbers
✆ 0161 830 8474 or
✆ 0113 247 1549.
You can also instruct us Online or you can contact team member’s Direct .
If you experience any difficulty connecting, you can call any of the following mobile numbers:
✆ 07970368665
✆ 07932238437
and our Client Care team stand ready to assist.
BUDGET RECOVERY (ON AVERAGE)
CLIENT SATISFACTION
SERVICING 200+ FIRMS
LATEST NEWS
Doyle v M&D Foundations & Building Services Ltd – windfall for the receiving party or be careful to what you agree?
Avi Dolties Doyle v M&D Foundations & Building Services Ltd Issue – In low value ex-protocol RTA, employer’s liability and public liability claims, does an agreement for costs to be ‘subject to detailed assessment if not agreed’ amount to an agreement between the parties to dis-apply Fixed Recoverable Costs (FRC)? Claimant argument – In this…
Costs Capping Application Refused
Lindsay Woolford In the matter of Thomas and others v PGI Group Ltd [2021] EWHC 2776 (QB) Mr Justice Cavanagh refused to grant the Defendant a Costs Capping Order under CPR 3.19, which is thought to be the first attempt at imposing a Costs Capping Order since the introduction of Cost Budgeting. The…
Ignore an Order giving permission to update your budget at your peril
Jessica Wiggins In Bhat & Anor v Patel & Anor [2021] EWHC 2960 (Ch) Mrs Justice Fancourt held that defendants, who had not filed a revised costs budget, were not entitled to recover the costs of that counterclaim unless a relief from sanctions application was successful. The parties were all doctors who had been, or…
