When a Judge ‘Steps Back’ What Do They See?

With Conflicting Authorities on how Proportionality is Assessed, how Should it be Dealt With? When the judgment in BNM v MGM was released, it established that contrary to the old proportionality rules, additional liabilities were to be taken into account when considering the proportionality of costs incurred. Inevitably the case has been heavily relied on by paying…

Introducing: MRN’s Insight Blog

The nature of how law firms charge clients and make money is in flux. Many changes have already taken place and more are in the pipeline beyond 2016. Keeping one step ahead of the rules and the Judiciary is a sure-fire way of ensuring you are not caught out and remain profitable through challenging times.…

Merrix v Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust

PLEASE SEE UPDATE OF THIS CASE HERE In a Post-Jackson World Only One Thing is Close to Certain: the Height of the Ceiling Background Of the various desired outcomes of the Jackson reforms, ‘certainty of costs’ was amongst the forerunners. Of the numerous bodies who were consulted as part of the investigations there was universal agreement…

Departure from a Cost Budget

In Sylvia Henry v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 19, the Claimant appealed a decision from Senior Costs Judge Hurst who refused to allow provision to depart from her approved cost budget, because of her failure to comply with the obligation to inform the Defendant of an increase to the approved costs. The…